Untitled

  • rss
  • archive
  • fairtradeusa:

Fair Trade Moms are strong, determined, and the heart of their families.Reblog if you agree & read their stories here: http://fairtradeusa.org/moms

    fairtradeusa:

    Fair Trade Moms are strong, determined, and the heart of their families.

    Reblog if you agree & read their stories here: http://fairtradeusa.org/moms

    Source: fairtradeusa
    • 3 weeks ago
    • 22 notes
  • fairtradeusa:

Today is World Water Day. Did you know Fair Trade helps enable access to safe drinking water?Press ‘like’ to help us raise awareness about this important issue!

    fairtradeusa:

    Today is World Water Day. Did you know Fair Trade helps enable access to safe drinking water?

    Press ‘like’ to help us raise awareness about this important issue!

    Source: fairtradeusa
    • 1 month ago
    • 41 notes
  • peacecorps:

World Water Day: Did you know?

85% of the world population lives in the driest half of the planet


6 to 8 million people die annually from the consequences of disasters and water-related diseases


About 66% of Africa is arid or semi-arid and more than 300 of the 800 million people in sub-Saharan Africa live in a water-scarce environment


Water for irrigation and food production constitutes one of the greatest pressures on freshwater resources. Agriculture accounts for ~70% of global freshwater withdrawals (up to 90% in some fast-growing economies)

    peacecorps:

    World Water Day: Did you know?

    • 85% of the world population lives in the driest half of the planet

    • 6 to 8 million people die annually from the consequences of disasters and water-related diseases

    • About 66% of Africa is arid or semi-arid and more than 300 of the 800 million people in sub-Saharan Africa live in a water-scarce environment

    • Water for irrigation and food production constitutes one of the greatest pressures on freshwater resources. Agriculture accounts for ~70% of global freshwater withdrawals (up to 90% in some fast-growing economies)

    Source: unwater.org
    • 1 month ago
    • 81 notes
  • “Physical intimacy isn’t and can never be an effective substitute for emotional intimacy.”
    — John Green (via godmoves)

    (via tenthousandangels)

    Source: atomosandentropy
    • 2 months ago
    • 15039 notes
  • http://a href="http//www.onlineassociatesdegree.com/eat-meat-die/"><img src="http://images.onlineassociatesdegree.com.s3.amazonaws.com/eat-meat-die.gif" alt="Eat Meat & Die" width="500" border="0" /></a><br />
    • 2 months ago
  • absolumentmoderne:

In 2002, Ramond Pettibon already saw the perils of internet instantaneity.
RAYMOND PETTIBONUntitled (I see before me…), 2002Lithograph19 5/8 x 13 1/2 in. / 49.8 x 34.3 cm.Edition of 75

    absolumentmoderne:

    In 2002, Ramond Pettibon already saw the perils of internet instantaneity.

    RAYMOND PETTIBON

    Untitled (I see before me…), 2002
    Lithograph
    19 5/8 x 13 1/2 in. / 49.8 x 34.3 cm.
    Edition of 75

    Source: absolumentmoderne
    • 2 months ago
    • 1155 notes
  • “I felt once more how simple and frugal a thing is happiness: a glass of wine, a roast chestnut, a wretched little brazier, the sound of the sea. Nothing else.”
    — Nikos Kazantzakis; Zorba the Greek (via wordpainting)

    (via tenthousandangels)

    Source: wordpainting
    • 2 months ago
    • 542 notes
  • Living With Less. A Lot Less.

    buynothingnewforayear:

    “Intuitively, we know that the best stuff in life isn’t stuff at all, and that relationships, experiences and meaningful work are the staples of a happy life.

    I like material things as much as anyone. I studied product design in school. I’m into gadgets, clothing and all kinds of things. But my experiences show that after a certain point, material objects have a tendency to crowd out the emotional needs they are meant to support.”

    Click on the link above to access the full article via The New York Times

    - written by Graham Hill, founder of TreeHugger.com and LifeEdited.com

    Source: buynothingnewforayear
    • 2 months ago
    • 43 notes
  • Source: buynothingnewforayear
    • 2 months ago
    • 195 notes
  • revjalen:

    New research shows common pesticides can kill frogs within an hour

    January 24,2013 - DGR News Service

    By Damian Carrington / The Guardian

    Widely used pesticides can kill frogs within an hour, new research has revealed, suggesting the chemicals are playing a significant and previously unknown role in the catastrophic global decline of amphibians.

    The scientists behind the study said it was both “astonishing” and “alarming” that common pesticides could be so toxic at the doses approved by regulatory authorities, adding to growing criticism of how pesticides are tested.

    “You would not think products registered on the market would have such a toxic effect,” said Carsten Brühl, at the University of Koblenz-Landau in Germany. “It is the simplest effect you can think of: you spray the amphibian with the pesticide and it is dead. That should translate into a dramatic effect on populations.”

    Trenton Garner, an ecologist at the Zoological Society of London, said: “This is a valuable addition to the substantial body of literature detailing how existing standards for the use of agricultural pesticides, herbicides and fertilisers are inadequate for the protection of biodiversity.”

    Amphibians are the best example of the great extinction of species currently under way, as they are the most threatened and rapidly declining vertebrate group. More than a third of all amphibians are included in the IUCN “red list” of endangered species, with loss of habitat, climate change and disease posing the biggest threats.

    Brühl had previously studied how easily frogs can absorb pesticides through their permeable skins, which they can breathe through when underwater. But pesticides are not required to be tested on amphibians, said Brühl: “We could only find one study for one pesticide that was using an exposure likely to occur on farmland.”

    His team chose widely used fungicides, herbicides and insecticides. The most striking results were for a fungicide called pyraclostrobin, sold as the product Headline by the manufacturer BASF and used on 90 different crops across the world. It killed all the common European frogs used as test animals within an hour when applied at the rate recommended on the label. Other fungicides, herbicides and insecticides also showed acute toxicity, even when applied at just 10% of the label rate, with the insecticide dimethoate, for example, killing 40% of animals within a week.

    The study, published on Thursday in Scientific Reports [will be live after embargo], concluded: “The observation of acute mortality in a vertebrate group caused by commercially available pesticides at recommended field rates is astonishing, since 50 years after the publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring one would have thought that the development of refined risk-assessment procedures would make such effects virtually impossible.”

    A BASF spokesman disputed the findings: “This study was performed under laboratory ‘worst-case’ conditions. Under normal agricultural conditions amphibians are not exposed to such pesticide concentrations. According to our knowledge, no significant impact on amphibian populations has been reported despite the widespread and global use of the fungicide pyraclostrobin.”

    Brühl said the method, a single spray directly on to the frogs, sometimes at just 10% of the label rate, was a “realistic worst-case” scenario. He added that in the field, multiple sprays of a variety of pesticides was likely and that chemicals might run off into ponds where frogs lived.

    Sandra Bell, Friends of the Earth’s nature campaigner, said: “From frogs to bees, there is mounting evidence that the pesticide bombardment of our farmland is having a major impact on our precious wildlife. Strong action is urgently needed to get farmers off the chemical treadmill.

    “As well as banning the most toxic products, governments must set clear targets for reducing all pesticides and ensure farmers have safe and thoroughly tested alternatives.”

    Earlier this month, the world’s most widely used insecticide was for the first time officially labelled an “unacceptable” danger to bees feeding on flowering crops, by the European Food Safety Agency. The agency had previously stated that current “simplistic” regulations contained “major weaknesses”.

    “There is an urgency to address [the amphibian issue] as pesticides will be applied again soon because it’s spring, and that’s when we have all these migrations to ponds,” said Brühl.

    “We don’t have any data from the wild about dead frogs because no one is looking for them – and if you don’t look, you don’t find. But the pesticides are very widely used and so have the potential to have a significant effect on populations.”

    Source

    (via )

    Source: revjalen
    • 3 months ago
    • 16 notes
© 2012–2013 Untitled
Next page
  • Page 1 / 6